检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林燕铭 周娜 韩汶静 吴明[1,2] LIN Yan-ming;ZHOU Na;HAN Wen-jing(Department of Health Policy and Management,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing,100191,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理系,北京100191 [2]北京大学卫生政策与技术评估中心,北京100191
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2022年第9期13-18,共6页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(15BGL192)。
摘 要:目的:分析药品集中带量采购政策对于药品利用与支出的影响。方法:利用2018—2019年的药品采购数据,采用双重差分模型比较了集采品种和同类替代非集采品种的价格、采购量、采购金额、质优药品的使用比例在药品集中带量采购政策实施后的变化。结果:药品集中带量采购试点政策实施后,与未实施试点政策的省份相比,实施试点政策或部分实施试点政策的省份集中采购试点品种的标化价格下降72.2%,标化采购量增加16.9%,采购费用下降55.3%,质优药品的使用比例增加15个百分点(均为P<0.01)。尚未发现集采品种的采购向同类替代非集采品种转移的证据。结论:药品带量集采政策有利于药品支出的控制和用药质量水平的提升,有必要扩大药品带量集采的覆盖面,尽快将中成药和生物类似药纳入集采之中。Objective:To analyze the impact of national volume-based procurement policy on drug utilization and expenditure.Methods:The drug procurement data from 2018 to 2019 was collected.The Difference-in-Difference(DID) model was used to compare the changes that occurred in centrally-purchased drugs and alternatives in terms of price,purchasing volume,purchasing expenditure,and the ratio of good-quality drugs.Results:After the implementation of the national volume-based procurement policy,the price of centrally-purchased drugs decreased by 72.2%,the volume increased by 16.9%,the procurement cost decreased by 55.3%,and the ratio of good-quality drugs increased by 15 percentage points(all P<0.01).Conclusion:The volume-based procurement policy is conducive to the medicine expenditure containment and the improvement of medicine quality.It is necessary to select more drugs into the volume-based procurement process,including Chinese patent medicines and bio similars.
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R19-0
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38