检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何柳 王伟男[2,3] He Liu;Wang Weinan(Shanghai Institute for Global Security Govenance Shanghai University of Political Science and Law;China National Institute for Sco International Exchange and Judicial Cooperation;Shanghai Institute of Taiwan Studies,School of International and Public Affairs,Shanghai Jiao Tong University;the Taiwan Research Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院上海全球安全治理研究院、中国-上海合作组织国际司法交流合作培训基地 [2]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院 [3]上海交通大学台湾研究中心
出 处:《台海研究》2022年第3期86-95,共10页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies
摘 要:美国介入俄乌战争的策略主要有:提前介入,联合盟友,全面制裁,强调价值观,谨慎拿捏。从截至目前的成效来看,美国的这种介入策略是基本有效的,有力地支持了乌克兰的抵抗行动,使俄罗斯针对乌克兰的“特别军事行动”遭受严重挫折。美国很可能把介入俄乌战争的策略运用到台海事务上,用于阻碍中国的统一大业。这必将进一步加剧中美之间本就存在的战略互疑,恶化本就紧张的台海局势。The strategy the United States employs to intervene in the Russia-Ukraine war mainly includes:getting involved in advance,uniting allies,imposing comprehensive sanctions,emphasizing values and tactful manipulating.Judging from the results so far,the United States’intervention strategy has been basically effective in bolstering the Ukrainian resistance and inflicting a severe setback on Russia’s“special military operations”against Ukraine.The United States is likely to apply its experience in the Russia-Ukraine war to the Taiwan question in order to thwart China’s reunification cause.This is bound to further aggravate the already existing strategic mutual suspicion between China and the United States and worsen the already tense situation across the Taiwan Strait.
分 类 号:D822.371.2[政治法律—政治学] D675.8[政治法律—外交学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7