马克思哲学变革的当代解码——《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》重大理论问题辨析  

Contemporary Decoding of Marx’s Philosophical Transformation——An Analysis of the Major Theoretical Problems in Theses on Feuerbach

作　　者：侯惠勤[1,2,3] Hou Huiqin

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院国家文化安全与意识形态建设研究中心,北京100732 [2]中国社会科学院大学,北京100732 [3]中国历史唯物主义学会

出　　处：《马克思主义研究》2022年第8期1-14,159,共15页Studies on Marxism

摘　　要：把马克思的《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》解读为“实践本体论”表明,该著作在很大程度上还是“熟悉的陌生人”。对于阿尔都塞关于马克思思想变革在1845年春发生的“认识论断裂”,列宁关于马克思在《德法年鉴》时期已经完成了从唯心主义向唯物主义、革命民主主义向共产主义“两个转变”的论断,关于费尔巴哈不懂什么样的能动性以及马克思为什么针对他来阐发自己的新唯物主义,关于科学实践观在马克思哲学体系中的正确定位等重大理论问题的辨析,是正确解读这一“包含新世界观萌芽的第一个文件”的关键,更是准确把握马克思哲学变革的实质和意义的关键。对马克思主义经典著作研究必须坚持忠实于原著的原则,不能拘泥于只言片语,不能望文生义,而是要把握其精神实质。The interpreting of Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach as a“practical ontology”shows that this work is still largely a“familiar stranger”.The discrimination of major theoretical issues,such as Althusser on the“epistemological break”of Marx’s ideological transformation in the spring of 1845,Lenin’s assertion that Marx had already completed the“two transformations”from idealism to materialism and from revolutionary democracy to communism during the period of German-French Annals,what kind of dynamism Feuerbach did not understand and why Marx formulated the new materialism against him,and the correct positioning of the scientific concept of practice in Marx’s philosophical system,are the key to the correct interpretation of this“first document containing the seeds of a new worldview”.It is also the key to grasping the essence and significance of Marx’s philosophical transformation.The study of classic Marxist works must adhere to the principle of being faithful to the original text,and not take the words too literally,but grasp its spiritual essence.

关 键 词：“认识论断裂” 自在自然和受动性 实践本体论 “认识论哲学” 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] B0-0