检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宏宝[1] ZHANG Hongbao
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学人文社会科学高等研究院,广州510631
出 处:《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期92-97,206,共7页Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“中国特色新型高校智库影响力形成及运行机制研究”(17YJC880122);国家社会科学基金项目一般项目“中国特色新型智库建设体制机制研究”(19BKS206)。
摘 要:大学智库治理主要依托组织、制度和价值三种机制发挥作用,三种机制在大学智库的治理过程中相互依存、相互支撑。随着中国大学智库建设初具规模,如何提升大学智库以质量为核心的“内涵”逐渐成为大学智库建设新一轮的挑战。从组织、制度和价值三个层面分析大学智库面临的治理困境,并在此基础上对大学智库的组织、制度和价值机制提出调整、规范与相互联动的对策建议,以提升大学智库治理主体的治理能力,深化大学共同治理的合作共识。The governance of university think tanks mainly relies on the three mechanisms of organization,system and value.The three mechanisms are interdependent and support each other in the process of university think tank governance. As the constructionof Chinese university think tanks has begun to take shape,how to improve the connotation of university think tanks with quality as thecore has gradually become a new challenge for university think tank construction. By analyzing the governance dilemmas faced by uni-versity think tanks on the three levels of organization,system and value,it is proposed that the organization,system and value mecha-nism of university think tanks should be adjusted,standardized and interacted with each other,so as to enhance the ability of the uni-versity think tank governance body and increase the cooperative consensus for university co-governance.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117