《克罗茨纳赫笔记》与《黑格尔法哲学批判》的关系及其理论意义  

The Relationship and and Theoretical Significance between the Krotsnach Notes and the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law

作　　者：刘家欢 Liu Jiahuan

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院

出　　处：《理论界》2022年第9期16-22,共7页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：《克罗茨纳赫笔记》为马克思在《黑格尔法哲学批判》中揭露黑格尔理性国家观的“头足倒置”提供了重要的历史史实支持,使其从思想发展的内在角度确证了费尔巴哈“主谓颠倒法”的合理性,从而为其思想转变补充了除《莱茵报》“物质利益的苦恼”和费尔巴哈“主谓颠倒法”的影响之外的重要环节--深入到历史研究、实现思想之内在转变的环节。同时,由于马克思在这一历史研究中不断体认到“不是国家决定市民社会,而是市民社会决定国家”的历史事实,并基于这种认识而逐渐转向市民社会批判,因此,《克罗茨纳赫笔记》也构成其历史唯物主义和经济学研究的起点和重要的思想资源。The Krotsnach Notes provides important historical support for Marx to expose the "head-foot inversion" of Hegel’s rational state view in Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law.It confirmed the rationality of Feuerbach’s "subjectpredicate inversion" method from the internal angle of ideological development,thus supplementing the important link besides the "distress of material interests" in Rheinische Zeitung and the influence of Feuerbach’s "subject-predicate reversal" method-the link of going deep into historical research and realizing the inner transformation of thought.At the same time,as young Marx constantly realized the historical fact that "it is not the state that determines civil society,but civil society that determines the state" in this historical study,and gradually turned to the civil society criticism based on this realization.Therefore,the Krotsnach Notes also constituted the starting point and important ideological resource of his study of historical materialism and economics.

关 键 词：克罗茨纳赫笔记 黑格尔法哲学批判 历史研究 

分 类 号：B1[哲学宗教—世界哲学]