检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季一鸣 眭鸿明[1] JI Yi-ming;SUI Hong-ming
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院
出 处:《江苏警官学院学报》2022年第5期13-20,共8页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
摘 要:传统学说认为,债权是合同法的主要客体,不属于侵权法的保护范围。然而,在第三人侵害债权现象越发普遍的背景下,以约束债权内部关系为主的合同法已无法对债权提供全面的保障。事实上,物权绝对性与债权相对性的区分并不是绝对的。在特殊情形下,债权也能够具备对世性、涉他性等法律效力,在遭受第三人不法侵害之时亦应能获得侵权法的保护。因此,为更好地维护我国社会主义市场经济秩序,亟需建立完善我国的债权侵权制度。Traditional theory holds that creditor’s right is the main object of contract law and does not belong to the protection scope of tort law. However, under the background of the phenomenon of the third party infringing on creditor’s rights more and more common, the contract law which mainly restrains the internal relationship of creditor’s rights cannot provide comprehensive protection for creditor’s rights. In fact, the distinction between absoluteness of real right and relativity of creditor’s right is not absolute. Under special circumstances, creditor’s right can also have the legal effect of the world and other, and it should also be protected by tort law when it is infringed by the third party. Therefore, in order to better maintain order of the socialist market economy of our country, it is necessary to perfect the creditor’s rights infringement system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62