检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑军[1] ZHENG Jun(School of Law,University of International Business and Economics,100029,Beijing,China)
出 处:《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第5期70-78,共9页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“数据的分享和控制法律体系研究”(19AZD026)。
摘 要:“网络主权”是在经济全球化与网络时代下,国家主权获得新发展的具体体现。在“世界百年未有之大变局加速演进”的时代背景下,国家间的竞争从经贸领域迅速扩张至其他领域,各国由此不断强化其国内法的域外效力与司法适用。《个人信息保护法》作为信息数字社会的基础性法律制度,对个人信息权益保护、信息数据的跨境提供、关键数据和敏感信息的特殊处理、域外机关的跨境调用等多个方面,已作出相应安排,但是仍然存在制度供给不足、配套措施滞后、法律责任类型单一、司法机关相对被动等方面的问题。为此,应当从以下方面作出改进:推进域外效力的配套制度供给研究,发挥行政监管在空间治理方面的作用,强化法院在法律域外适用中的角色定位,从立法、执法、司法等方面统筹推进,以构建具有域外效力的法治体系为理念与目标,扩展相关国内法的域外效力。“Cyber sovereignty” is a concrete manifestation of the new development of national sovereignty in the context of economic globalization and the cyber era. In the new context of the “unprecedented changes of the century”, countries are constantly strengthening the extraterritorial effects and judicial application of their domestic laws, and the competition among countries is rapidly expanding from the economic and trade fields to other fields. As a fundamental legal rule for the information digital society,the Personal Information Protection Law has made certain corresponding arrangements in a number of areas such as the protection of the rights and interests of personal information, the cross-border provision of information data, the special handling of critical data and sensitive information, and the cross-border recall of extraterritorial authorities. However, there are still such problems including insufficient supply of systematic regulation, lagging supporting measures, simplifying types of legal responsibility, and relatively passive judiciary reactions. Expected improvements should be made in the following areas: promoting research on the supply of supporting systems for extraterritoriality, giving play to the role of administrative supervision in spatial governance, and strengthening the role of courts in the extraterritorial application of laws. We should make an integrated effort in legislation, law enforcement and judiciary to build a rule of law system with extraterritorial effects as the concept and goal, and efficiently expand the extraterritorial effects of relevant domestic laws.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85