检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄正建 Huang Zhengjian
机构地区:[1]不详
出 处:《中华文史论丛》2022年第3期211-228,408,共19页Journal of Chinese Literature and History
摘 要:本文從杜佑對所引史料的選擇和剪裁入手,探討杜佑的法律思想,發現杜佑論述“刑制”歷史時,所引資料均删去了有關“以禮化民”等内容,不認馬“刑”後於“禮”而產生,對以德禮仁義治國持懷疑態度。這與一般認為杜佑主張以禮樂治國的看法有很大不同。此外,杜佑詳細引用記錄了當時辦案過程的史料的做法也極其少見,反映了他重實踐重程序重法典的法律思想。Starting with Du You's selection and operation of the historical materials cited,this paper discusses Du You's legal thoughts.It is found that when he discussed the history of“criminal system”,all contents dealing with“eivilizing the people with etiquette”were deleted from the materials he cited.He did not think that“punishment”came after“etiquette”,and was skeptical about governing the c country with virtue,etiquette and charity.This is quite different from a generalv view v about Du You'opinion of state governance with etiquette and music.In addition,it is rare for Du You to cite historical materia als in detail with recording of trial process at that time,it also reflects his legal thought of stressing practice,procedure and legal code.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7