检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷锦锦[1] 严鹏科[1] 杜培丽[2] 毛丽丽[2] 谭湘萍[1] 梅峥嵘[1] 刘少志[1] Yin Jinjin;Yan Pengke;Du Peili;Mao Lili;Tan Xiangping;Mei Zhengrong;Liu Shaozhi(Department of Pharmacy,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases,Guangzhou Medical Center Pregnant Women,Guangzhou 510515,China;Department of Obstetrics and Cynecology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases,Guangzhou Medical Center Pregnant Women,Guangzhou 510515,China)
机构地区:[1]广州医科大学附属第三医院药学部,广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室,广州重症孕产妇救治中心,510150 [2]广州医科大学附属第三医院产科,广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室,广州重症孕产妇救治中心,510150
出 处:《中华产科急救电子杂志》2022年第3期165-171,共7页Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的建立剖宫产手术预防性使用抗菌药物的量化评价体系,为科学、客观评价剖宫产术预防使用抗菌药物的合理应用提供参考。方法以《抗菌药物临床应用指导原则(2015版)》、相关药品说明书、相关临床指南为依据,由药学部、产科专家共同讨论制定剖宫产手术预防性使用抗菌药物合理性评价标准。采用层次分析法对评价指标进行赋权,并利用逼近理想排序法对172例剖宫产手术患者的归档病历进行回顾性分析和合理性评价。结果建立的评价标准包括4个一级指标和12个二级指标。172个病例中,预防用药合理的有80例(46.51%),基本合理20例(11.62%),不合理72例(41.86%)。结论应用层次分析法加权逼近理想排序法对剖宫产围术期预防使用抗菌药物的合理使用进行综合评价,方法科学,结果可信,具有较广泛的临床适用范围。Objective To establish a quantitative evaluation system for prophylactic use of antibiotics in cesarean section,and to provide a reference for scientific and objective evaluation of prophylactic use of antibiotics in cesarean section.Methods Based on the guiding principles of clinical application of antibacterial drugs(2015 edition),related drug specifications and clinical guidelines,the evaluation criteria of prophylactic use of antibiotics in the cesarean section were discussed by experts of pharmacy and obstetrics.The analytic hierarchy process was used to weight the evaluation index,and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution was used to analyze retrospectively and evaluate the rationality of 172 cases of cesarean section.Results The established evaluation criteria included 4 first-class indicators and 12 second-class indicators.Among the 172 cases,80 cases(46.51%)were reasonably used for prevention,20 cases(11.62%)were basically reasonable,and 72 cases(41.86%)were unreasonable.Conclusions Using AHP weighted TOPSIS method to evaluate the rational use of antibiotics in cesarean section,the method is scientific,the result is credible,and has a wide range of applications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222