中低速磁浮列车与轮轨式城轨列车技术特点的对比研究  

Contrastive Study on Technical Features of Low-medium Speed Maglev Train and Wheel/Rail-type Urban Rail Transit

作　　者：黄金 张桂南 张世聪 HUANG Jin;ZHANG Guinan;ZHANG Shicong(Locomotive&Car Research Institute,China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited,Beijing 100081,China;State Key Laboratory of Traction and Control for EMU and Locomotives,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司机车车辆研究所,北京100081 [2]动车组和机车牵引与控制国家重点实验室,北京100081

出　　处：《铁道机车车辆》2022年第5期129-134,共6页Railway Locomotive & Car

基　　金：2017年中国科协青年人才托举工程项目(2017QNRC001)。

摘　　要：中低速磁浮列车与传统轮轨式城轨列车的技术特性之间存在显著的差异,目前仍然缺乏对这些差异直接进行对比分析的整车测试数据。对某A型磁浮和某B型地铁列车在能耗、噪声和运行平稳性3个方面进行了整车线路实测,结果显示A型磁浮列车在具有相似的典型运行能耗组成的情况下,具有更高的单位起动加速能耗,且在速度46~80 km/h时具有更大的运行阻力,所以其牵引能耗显著超过传统轮轨式城轨列车;两列车在内部噪声水平上无明显区别,A型磁浮列车在静止和加速工况下的外部噪声水平高于B型地铁,但在80 km/h的恒速工况下,外部噪声水平更低;A型磁浮列车具有更好的实测运行平稳性。Significant differences exist between the technical characteristics of the low medium speed maglev train and the traditional wheel/rail type urban rail train,but related test data for complete direct comparative analysis of these differences on vehicles is still insufficient.The track measurement of complete vehicle from three aspects of energy consumption,noise and running stability of type A maglev and type B metro train shows that type A maglev train has higher starting and acceleration energy consumption and greater resistance to motion at speed of 46-80 km/h while having similar typical run energy consumption composition,so its traction energy consumption significantly exceeds that of the traditional wheel/rail type urban rail trains;no significant difference exists between the two trains in terms of internal noise level,the external noise level of type A maglev train under static and accelerating conditions is higher than that of type B metro train,but the external noise level is lower under the constant speed condition of 80 km/h;type A maglev train has better measured running stability.

关 键 词：中低速磁浮列车 轮轨式地铁列车 能耗 噪声 运行平稳性 整车试验 

分 类 号：U266.4[机械工程—车辆工程]