清代“伤人致死”司法情境下对因果关系的认知差异分析——以《曾国荃判牍》中“糜少芝”案为例  

Analysis of Cognitive Differences of Causality in the Judicial Situation of“Injury Causing Death”in the Qing Dynasty-Taking the case of“Mi Shaozhi”in“Records of Cases Tried by Zeng Guoquan”as an example

作　　者：石泉 SHI Quan(Faculty of Humanities,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810000,Qinghai)

机构地区：[1]青海师范大学人文学院,青海西宁810000

出　　处：《宝鸡文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期65-69,共5页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：“故意伤害致人死亡”是中国古代律例中普遍认定的一种犯罪行为。在不同的历史时期,这一罪名被赋以不同的词称。基于特定行为对他人生命权存续造成侵害这一必然结果的发生,刑责惩戒和权益补偿即会随之成为州县官员在此类案件承审环节所集中思考解决的重点问题。清代“糜少芝”一案即属此种情形。该案中,行为过程与事实结果二者间前后关联性的密切程度、从不同视角涉入案情所形成的差异性认识,直接影响着对案中人予以何种责任承担和罪名拟定的思维路径,甚至决定了“生死有别”观念下刑种施行轻重程度的取舍选择以及古代法律所一贯标榜“审慎人命”基本功用的实现程度。“Intentional injury causing death”is a generally recognized responsibility-bearing behavior in the text of laws and regulations.Although it has been referred to as different terms in different historical periods,it is based on specific behaviors that cause infringement of the existence of the right to life of others.Once the inevitable result occurs,criminal punishment and compensation for rights and interests will then become the key issues that the state and county officials focus on and solve in the trial process,in order to realize the content of the final trial result“believe without doubt,don’t let it go in vain”external look and feel.Among them,in the case of“Mi Shaozhi”in the Qing Dynasty,the closeness of the“correlation”between the behavioral process and the factual result,the different understandings formed by involving the case from different perspectives directly affect what to do to the person involved in the case.This kind of responsibility and the way of thinking for the formulation of charges even determines the choice of the severity of punishment under the concept of“life and death are different”and the realization of the basic function of“prudent life”as always advertised in ancient laws.

关 键 词：“故意伤人致死” 方式手段 行为结果 目的考虑 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]