对“底线正义”的一点思考--基于《公共法哲学:转型中国的法治与正义》  

On Bottom-line Justice--Based on Philosophy of Public Law:The Rule of Law and Justice in Transitional China

作　　者：陈诗钰[1,2] CHEN Shi-yu(School of Philosophy,Hubei University,Wuhan,430062,China;School of Marxism,Hubei University of Medicine,Shiyan 442000,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北大学哲学学院,湖北武汉430062 [2]湖北医药学院马克思主义学院、人文社会科学学院,湖北十堰442000

出　　处：《汉江师范学院学报》2022年第5期15-18,共4页Journal of Hanjiang Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“全人类共同价值研究”(21&ZD015)中期成果。

摘　　要：“底线正义”是道德政治的一部分,是道德政治的基本伦理、社会进步的价值和“以人为本”的基本公德。“底线正义”是体现社会效率和稳定性最重要方面的一种形式。孙国东认为“反正义的公平观”是一个极端激进的正义观念。“反正义的公平观”正是从“公平”原则出发,而违反了“正义”原则情形。从转型中国的政治和社会、历史出发,孙国东试图构建一种转型中国结构化情境的“底线正义”诸原则,这一原则在罗尔斯正义原则的基础上,又加上了商谈民主原则和法治原则。坚持“底线正义”的原则,需要对正义的构成进行严格的制度和程序理论的建构,以便在实践中产生真正的理解。Bottom-line justice is part of moral politics,which is a basic ethic of moral politics,a value of social progress and a fundamental public virtue of"putting people first".Bottom-line justice is one of the most important aspects of social efficiency and stability.According to Sun Guodong,the"anti-justice concept of fairness"is an extremely radical concept of justice,which starts from the principle of"fairness"and violates the principle of"justice".From the political,social and historical perspectives of China in transition,Sun Guodong attempts to construct a principle of"bottom-line justice"in the structured context of transitional China,which adds the principles of deliberative democracy and the rule of law to the Rawlsian principles of justice.Adherence to the principles of"bottom-line justice"requires a rigorous institutional and procedural theoretical construction of what constitutes justice in order to generate real understanding in practice.

关 键 词：底线正义 反正义的公平 罗尔斯 分配正义 商谈民主原则 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]