检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张爱民[1] 刘育明[1] 李真 冯喜龙 ZHANG Aimin;LIU Yuming;LI Zhen;FENG Xilong
机构地区:[1]中国恩菲工程技术有限公司,北京100038 [2]本溪龙新矿业有限公司,辽宁本溪117000
出 处:《中国矿山工程》2022年第5期32-36,共5页China Mine Engineering
摘 要:针对深井厚大矿体,往往优先选用大直径深孔空场嗣后充填法进行开采,但如何进一步减少采切比、提高盘区生产能力一直是我们面临的主要技术难题。本文以思山岭铁矿大规模开采为例,探究采场大段高回采的技术经济可行性,对120 m大段高和60 m段高进行详细技术经济对比,推荐思山岭铁矿首采-1 020 m中段依然采用60 m段高进行开采。Large-diameter deep-hole open stoping with subsequent backfilling method is often preferred for mining deep and thick deposits, but how to further reduce cutting-mining ratio and improve panel production capacity remains the main technical challenge we face. Taking as an example the large-scale mining in Sishanling Iron Ore Mine, this paper explored the techno-economic feasibility of large lift stoping. Detailed techno-economic comparison was made between 120 m lift and 60 m lift. As a conclusion, 60 m lift was still proposed for the-1 020 m starter level of Sishanling.
分 类 号:TD853[矿业工程—金属矿开采]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.64.3