检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张信福 朱跃文 ZHANG Xin-fu;ZHU Yue-wen(Shouxian Hospital County,Shouxian 232200,Anhui;不详)
机构地区:[1]寿县县医院儿科,安徽淮南232200 [2]六安市人民医院儿科,安徽六安237000
出 处:《安徽医专学报》2022年第5期53-55,共3页Journal of Anhui Medical College
基 金:安徽省科技攻关计划项目(编号:AKJ201975212)。
摘 要:目的:探讨无创吸痰技术对婴幼儿下呼吸道感染的治疗效果。方法:选取医院收治的70例下呼吸道感染婴幼儿患儿,随机分为研究组(40例,使用无创吸痰技术)和对照组(30例,使用传统非无创插管吸痰技术)。分析对比两组患儿治疗效果。结果:研究组患儿及其家属依从率明显高于对照组(P<0.05);患儿临床症状消失时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05);吸痰效果、炎症因子改善情况明显优于对照组(P<0.05);呼吸道黏膜损伤等并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:无创吸痰技术治疗效果显著优于传统非无创吸痰技术。Objective:To analyze the therapeutic effect of non-invasive sputum aspiration technique on lower respiratory tract infection in infants.Methods:A total of 70 infants and children with lower respiratory tract infection admitted to Hospital were selected and randomly divided into the study group(40 cases,using non-invasive sputum aspiration technique)and the control group(30 cases,using traditional non-invasive intubation sputum aspiration technique).To analyze and compare the nursing effect of the two groups.Results:The compliance rate of children and their families in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The disappearance time of clinical symptoms was significantly shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05).The effect of sputum aspiration and the improvement of inflammatory factors were significantly better than those of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of respiratory mucosal injury and other complications was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The treatment effect of non-invasive sputum aspiration technique is significantly better than that of traditional non-invasive sputum aspiration technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229