“请托之债”的性质及请托纠纷的司法裁判  

The Nature of "Entrusted Debt" and the Judicial Judgment of Entrusted Dispute

作　　者：滕威[1] 商雪娇 TENG Wei;SHANG Xue-jiao(People s Court of Huaiyin District of Huai an,Huai an,Jiangsu 223300)

机构地区：[1]淮安市淮阴区人民法院,江苏淮安223300

出　　处：《淮阴师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第6期557-561,647,共6页Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：对于“请托给付行为”,法院大多将其认定为违反公序良俗的行为,但在裁判结果上却大相径庭。“请托之债”给付人所选择的请求权基础不同是造成法院裁判结果大相径庭的主要原因。应将“请托给付行为”认定为自然债务而非法律债务,如果给付人提起诉讼,法院应判决驳回其诉讼请求,以统一司法裁判标准。As for the "act of asking for payment", most courts regard it as a violation of public order and good customs, but the judgment results are quite different. The different basis of the right of claim chosen by the payers of the "debt of petition" is the main reason for the different court decisions. The "act of asking for payment" should be recognized as a natural debt rather than a legal debt. If the payer brings a lawsuit, the court should reject the lawsuit request to unify the standard of judicial adjudication.

关 键 词：请托行为 “请托之债” 请求权基础 不法原因给付 

分 类 号：D923.3[政治法律—民商法学]