论近代爱国主义教育的缘起与当代启思——从孔飞力《中国现代国家的起源》谈起  

The Origin of Modern Patriotism Education and Its Contemporary Enlightment——Thoughts on Origins of the Modern Chinese State by Kong Feili

作　　者：戴红宇 刘春明 DAI Hong-yu;LIU Chun-ming(College of Educational Science,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241000,China;College of Marxism,Sanming University,Sanming Fujian 365004,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学教育科学学院,安徽芜湖241000 [2]三明学院马克思主义学院,福建三明365004

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期16-24,共9页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：福建省社会科学研究基地重大项目“文化强国语境下的经世致用思想研究”(FJ2020MJDZ037)。

摘　　要：孔飞力从政治参与和政治控制的视角揭示了近代中国国家的建构,中国的现代民族国家意识、民族国家观念在很大程度上是外源的。现代语境下的爱国主义不同于传统的政治道德,经历了国家意识的形成和国民身份的认同两个向度的历程。在国家与国民概念的转变与冲突过程中,“公共利益”成为消解中西方文明差异、文化差异的中介载体。爱国主义教育在注重国家的道德控制的同时,也应注重民众的道德参与。当前,爱国主义教育应转向对公共利益的关注,通过培养与公共利益相关的道德参与能力,丰富现实内容和实现路径,使之贴近现实生活和道德实践,提升爱国主义教育的实效。Kong Feili revealed the construction of modern China from the perspectives of political participation and political control. China’s modern consciousness and notion of national state were largely exogenous. Dfferent from traditional political morality, patriotism in the modern context experienced the formation of national consciousness and the identification of national identity in two dimensions. In the process of the change of and conflict between the concepts of the state and citizens, “public interest” functions as the intermediary carrier to resolve the differences between Chinese and Western civilizations and cultures. Patriotism education should attach importance to people’s moral participation in addition to its national moral control. At present, patriotism education should focus on public interest and enrich the realistic content and implementation paths by cultivating the ability of moral participation related to the public interest to make it close to real life and moral practice and to enhance the effectiveness of patriotism education.

关 键 词：爱国主义 爱国主义教育 道德控制 道德参与 

分 类 号：D641[政治法律—政治学]