检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史恒通[1] 荣瑶 毛慧 SHI Hengtong;RONG Yao;MAO Hui(International Business School,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,China;Northwest Institute of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,China)
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学国际商学院,陕西西安710119 [2]陕西师范大学西北历史环境与经济社会发展研究院,陕西西安710119
出 处:《农林经济管理学报》2022年第5期527-536,共10页Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(20YJC790114);陕西省创新能力支撑计划软科学研究计划面上项目(2020KRM203)。
摘 要:基于黄土高原退耕还林区的395户农户微观调研数据,利用Heckprobit模型实证分析社会资本、非农收入对农户林地管护意愿的影响及其作用机制。结果表明:(1)社会资本对农户林地管护参与意愿和参与程度均具有促进作用。其中,社会网络和社会信任均正向影响农户林地管护参与意愿和参与程度;主动参与显著抑制农户林地管护参与意愿,显著促进农户林地管护参与程度,被动参与对农户林地管护参与意愿和参与程度均有促进作用。(2)非农收入显著抑制农户林地管护参与意愿,显著促进农户林地管护参与程度,且非农收入在社会资本对农户林地管护意愿的影响中具有中介效应。(3)年龄、农户退耕前的种植规模、制度环境以及农户的生态理性均正向影响农户的林地管护参与意愿,健康状况显著负向影响农户的林地管护参与意愿。另外,相较于女性,男性户主具有更高的林地管护参与程度。基于此,建议政府部门重点关注退耕还林地区农户社会资本的培育,并重视非农收入对农户参与林地管护的重要意义,推动巩固“退耕还林”成果长效机制的建立。Based on the micro-survey data of 395 farmers in the area where farmland has been returned to forests in the Loess Plateau,the Heckprobit Model was used to explore the influence of social capital and non-agricultural income on farmers’ willingness to protect forest land and its mechanism.The results show that firstly,social capital can promote farmers’ willingness and their participation in forestland management and protection.In particular,social network and social trust have a positive impact;however,active participation significantly inhibits farmers’ willingness to participate in forestland management and protection but significantly promotes their participation in forestland management and protection.In contrast,passive participation promotes both their willingness and participation.Secondly,non-agricultural income significantly inhibits farmers’ willingness to participate in forestland management and protection and significantly promotes their participation in forestland management and protection.Meanwhile,such non-agricultural income has an intermediary effect in the impact of social capital on their willingness to participate in forestland management and protection.Thirdly,age,planting scale,institutional environment and farmers’ ecological rationality before they return farmland to forest have a positive impact on their willingness while health status has a significant negative impact.In addition,compared with women,male heads of households have a higher degree of participation in forestland management and protection.Therefore,it is suggested that government departments should make more efforts to cultivate farmers’ social capital in the area where farmland has been returned to forests,and pay attention to the significance of non-agricultural income to farmers’ participation in forest land management and protection,so as to promote the establishment of a long-term mechanism to consolidate the achievements of“returning farmland to forests”.
分 类 号:F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171