涉禁限用农药专利的实质审查  

Patent Substantive Examination of Patents Involving Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides

作　　者：王伟民 汤怀武 梁艳辉[1] WANG Weimin;TANG Huaiwu;LIANG Yanhui(Patent Examination Cooperation Jiangsu Center of the Patent Office,CNIPA,Suzhou 215163,China)

机构地区：[1]国家知识产权局专利局专利审查协作江苏中心,江苏苏州215163

出　　处：《河南科技》2022年第20期151-154,共4页Henan Science and Technology

摘　　要：毒西瓜、毒豇豆、乙草胺草莓的食品安全事件屡见报道。如何保证食品安全,合理使用农药等问题亟待解决。涉禁限用农药专利的审查如何把握,公众利益与申请人利益之间如何权衡,这些问题在专利审查过程中值得深思。DDT的使用经历了广泛使用—禁用—重新使用的过程,随着社会发展、农药研究的不断深入,高毒农药逐渐被禁止或限制使用。但禁限用农药相关的专利还在继续申请,禁限用农药在专利审查过程中可以借鉴DDT的使用过程,在权衡利弊的同时,维护专利法的立法宗旨。Food safety incidents of poisoned watermelon, poisonous cowpea, and acetochlor strawberry are frequently reported. The problem of how to ensure food safety and rational use of pesticides needs to be solved urgently. How to grasp the examination of patents involving prohibited and restricted pesticides, and how to balance the interests of the public and the applicant, these issues are worth pondering during the patent examination process. Throughout the history of DDT use: widely used-disabled-reused. With the development of society and the continuous progress of pesticide research, the use of highly toxic pesticides has been gradually banned or restricted. Patents related to banned and restricted pesticides are still being applied for. During the patent examination process, the use history of DDT can be used for reference. While weighing the pros and cons, the legislative purpose of the patent law is maintained.

关 键 词：禁用农药 限用农药 甲胺磷 DDT 公共利益 

分 类 号：F767.2[经济管理—产业经济] D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]