再议“汉语名动包含说”  

Further Discussions on“Chinese Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis”

作　　者：陆俭明[1] LU Jianming(Department of Chinese/Center of Chinese Linguistics,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学中国语言学研究中心/中文系,北京100871

出　　处：《外国语》2022年第5期2-14,共13页Journal of Foreign Languages

摘　　要：本文从四个方面评议沈家煊先生的“名动包含说”:(一)对比分析“名动分立”和“名动包含”;(二)“名动包含说”思路会有可能引出荒唐的“谓名包含说”;(三)关于“简洁准则”和“中心扩展条件”“并列条件”;(四)“名动包含说”的根本问题在哪里?本文的中心意思是,“名动包含说”还需深思、慎思;希望沈家煊先生能提出“名动包含说”的具体实施方案,而不是只在“理论”上反复论述。当然,我们也并不认为目前的“名动分立”汉语词类体系就很完美,我们还会努力探究。This article offers further comments on the Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis proposed by Professor Shen Jiaxuan.The main text is divided into four parts:1)A comparison between Noun-verb Exclusion Theory and Nounverb Inclusion Hypothesis;2)an analysis of a possible predicate-noun inclusion hypothesis which is indicated by Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis;3)a discussion of the Principle of Simplicity and two conditions:head expansion condition(HEC)and coordination condition(CC);4)and the underlying loopholes in Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis.The theme of this article is that Noun-verb Inclusion Hypothesis should be considered more cautiously,and that Prof Shen is expected to propose specific operational processes rather than to argue repeatedly only from the theoretical point of view,if he wishes to hold his own ground.

关 键 词：词类 汉语词类观 名动分立说 名动包含说 

分 类 号：H04[语言文字—语言学]