检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: 陈海田(译) Elena Atienza Macías;CHEN Haitian(translator)(Law Faculty of Deusto University,Donostia-San Sebastián 20001,Spain;School of International Law of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
机构地区:[1]西班牙德乌斯托大学法学院,圣塞瓦斯蒂安20001 [2]上海政法学院国际法学院,上海201701
出 处:《体育科研》2022年第6期29-34,共6页Sport Science Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD337)。
摘 要:从比较法视野出发,西班牙刑法对体育领域,尤其是在运动员服用兴奋剂实施刑事制裁的问题上存在分歧。有的反对将兴奋剂违法行为入刑,有的则同意制定特定的体育犯罪,但对于罪名是保护一项独特权利还是保护几项权利,并没有一个“和平”的界定。换言之,要想为统一处罚兴奋剂相关行为提供依据,必须确定兴奋剂犯罪中是否存在其他犯罪无法充分保护、可涉及的若干法律权利。Under the Spanish Criminal Law,the issue of applying criminal sanctions to the sports sphere,in particular to the doping area,has been accompanied with the introduction of specific crimes if committed by the athlete,such as the consumption of prohibited substances,as it appears from the Comparative Law.The Spanish doctrine about the reference of criminal law to the sporting area is divided:on the one hand,there are the positions against the use of Criminal Law for introducing new specific crimes related to doping;on the other hand,within authors who agree on the formulation of a specific crime for sport,there is not a'peaceful'delimitation of whether the offense protects an unique legal right or several rights.In other words,it is essential to determine if there are several legal rights that can be involved in a doping crime,which are inadequately protected by other crimes,so as to justify an unified punishment of the behaviors related to doping.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171