检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宁宁 Wang Ningning(Southwest University of Political Science Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《贵州警察学院学报》2022年第5期67-76,共10页Journal of Guizhou Police College
基 金:2021年度国家社会科学基金项目(21BFX022);西南政法大学2021年度学生科研创新项目(2021XZXS-145)。
摘 要:养老服务合同是养老机构与老人或其代理人对双方权利义务的安排,但司法裁判就合同中格式条款的效力认定存在分歧。针对养老服务合同中不同类型的格式条款,法院的态度和裁判思路存在差异,反映出当前司法实践中存在的格式条款的效力审查范围模糊、法律适用混乱、裁判标准不清的问题。通过排除核心给付条款和给付描述条款,以界定养老服务合同中格式条款的效力审查范围。从一般法律行为和免责条款的效力判断规则出发,构建层层递进式的效力审查路径。从价值位阶、合同目的、给付均衡、风险的控制与分担的角度细化养老服务合同中格式条款的“合理性”审查标准,并对养老服务合同中格式条款的效力争议作以回应。Elderly service contract is an arrangement of the rights and obligations of the nursing home with the elderly or their agents.However,judicial judgments have different opinions on the validity of standard clauses in this contract.Regarding different types of standard clauses in elderly service contracts,the court’s attitudes and judgments are different.This phenomenon reflects current judicial problems,including vague scope of review,confusion in application of laws,and unclear judgment standards.By excluding core payment clauses and payment description clauses,the scope of validity review of standard clauses in elderly service contract is defined.With the help of legal norm of judging validity on the general legal actions and the exemptions,a progressive path of validity review is constructed.From the civil value rank,contract purpose,payment balance and risk-controlling,it refines the"reasonability"review standard of standard clauses in elderly service contracts.Finally,the paper responds to the dispute about the validity of standard clauses in elderly service contracts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.112.12