五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛临床研究  

Clinical Study on Five-Note Therapy Combined with Yi-Cupping for Low Back Pain of Liver-Kidney Depletion Syndrome

作　　者：孟盈盈[1] 李夏[1] 余建敏[1] 潘胜莲[1] 卢韵琦[1] MENG Yingying;LI Xia;YU Jianmin;PAN Shenglian;LU Yunqi

机构地区：[1]温州市中医院针灸推拿科,浙江温州325000

出　　处：《新中医》2022年第18期79-83,共5页New Chinese Medicine

基　　金：温州市基础性科研项目(Y2020908)。

摘　　要：目的:观察五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛的临床疗效。方法:将80例肝肾亏虚证腰痛患者按简单随机法分试验A组、试验B组、试验C组及对照组各20例。对照组接受基础药物治疗,试验A组在对照组的基础上采用五音联合易罐疗法,试验B组在对照组的基础上采用易罐疗法,试验C组在对照组的基础上采用五音疗法。疗程均为2周,观察比较4组临床疗效,以及治疗前后疼痛数字评分法(NRS)评分、汉密尔顿焦虑评分(HAMA)的变化。结果:治疗后,试验A、试验B组、试验C组总有效率均高于对照组,试验A组总有效率亦高于试验B组、试验C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验B组与试验C组间总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前,4组NRS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,4组NRS评分均较治疗前显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验A组、试验B组NRS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05),而试验C组NRS评分虽低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验A组NRS评分低于试验B组(P<0.05);试验A组、试验B组NRS评分均低于试验C组(P<0.05)。治疗前,4组HAMA评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,试验A组HAMA评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05);试验A组HAMA评分低于对照组、试验B组(P<0.05),试验A组HAMA评分与试验C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验B组、试验C组、对照组HAMA评分治疗前后及治疗后组间两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛,能显著改善患者疼痛及焦虑情绪,提高临床疗效。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of five-note therapy combined with Yi-cupping for low back pain of liver-kidney depletion syndrome. Methods:A total of 80 cases of patients with low back pain of liver-kidney depletion syndrome were divided into the experiment group A,the experiment group B,the experiment group C and the control group,with 20 cases in each group. The control group was treated with basic medication;based on the treatment of the control group,the experiment group A was additionally treated with five-note therapy combined with Yi-cupping;the experiment group B was additionally treated with Yi-cupping therapy,and the experiment group C was additionally treated with fivenote therapy. All groups were treated for two weeks. Changes in the scores of Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) before and after treatment as well as clinical effects in the four groups were observed and compared. Results:After treatment,the total effective rate of experiment group A,experiment group B and experiment group C was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);The total effective rate of group A was also higher than that of group B and group C(P<0.05).The total effective rate in the experiment group A was higher than those in the other three groups(P<0.05);the total effective rates in the experiment group B and the experiment group C were higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of total effective rates between the experiment group B and the experiment group C(P>0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of scores of NRS among the four groups(P>0.05). After treatment, scores of NRS in the four groups were significantly decreased when compared with those before treatment,differences being significant(P<0.05);NRS scores in the experiment group A and the experiment group B were lower than that in the control group(P<0.05);NRS score in the experiment group C was lower than tha

关 键 词：腰痛 肝肾亏虚证 五音疗法 易罐疗法 疼痛数字评分法 汉密尔顿焦虑评分 

分 类 号：R255.6[医药卫生—中医内科学]