全球危机治理中的大国权力模式:以中俄参与解决叙利亚危机为例  

The Power Great of Great Powers in Global Crisis Governance:Taking China and Russia’s Participation in Solving the Syria Crisis as an Example

作　　者：刘莹 Liu Ying

机构地区：[1]外交学院国际关系研究所

出　　处：《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》2022年第5期18-35,165,166,共20页Russian，East European & Central Asian Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“全球治理中的中俄合作研究”(22BGJ07)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：本文聚焦大国在全球危机治理中的权力模式问题,运用现实建构主义“权力政治的社会建构”概念中权力的四种模式分析法,比较中国和俄罗斯在参与解决叙利亚危机过程中分别施加的结构性权力和强制性权力,以及在推动和谈进程、解决化武危机、开展人道主义救援及与各方构建话语体系中使用的制度性权力和生产性权力,并分析其背后的动因。以中俄为代表的大国在解决地区和全球危机时,虽然在权力模式及影响作用上存在不同,但也须协调立场并紧密合作。未来中俄应在参与叙战后重建和其他全球危机治理中进一步发挥负责任大国作用,推动后疫情时代全球治理变革。This paper focuses on the power model of major powers in the global crisesgovernance,and uses the four power model analysis methods in the concept of“socialconstruction of power politics”of realistic constructivism to compare the structural power,mandatory power,institutional power and productive power that China andRussia have respectively imposed in the process of participating in the resolution of theSyria crisis,and analyze the reasons behind them.The major powers represented byChina and Russia should coordinate their positions and cooperate closely in resolvingregional and global crises,although they have different power models and influences.Inthe future,China and Russia should further play the role of a responsible major powerin participating in the post-war reconstruction of Syria and other global crisesgovernance,and promote the reform of global governance in the post-epidemic era.

关 键 词：全球治理 权力模式 中国 俄罗斯 叙利亚危机 

分 类 号：D851.2[政治法律—政治学] D822.337.6[政治法律—外交学]