唐代书目中选本、评论的位置变迁与总集观念演进  

Selections and Critical Works’ Position Change and the Evolution of Concept of Zongji in Bibliographies of Tang Dynasty

作　　者：翟新明[1] ZHAI Xin-ming

机构地区：[1]湖南大学文学院

出　　处：《北京社会科学》2022年第11期61-70,共10页Social Sciences of Beijing

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CZW016)——中古总集观念演进与编纂互动研究。

摘　　要：分析了唐代书目中选本、评论的位置变迁情况,考察了唐代古典目录学中总集观念的演进,认为唐代处于转折时期。《隋书·经籍志》将《七录》总集、杂文二部合并为总集类,同时著录多体与分体选本、解释评论之作以及单篇、一人作品,总集范围得以扩大。毋煚《古今书录》延续总集类名,但对所著录文献多有增删,评论著作也被有意识地移置总集类之末。从《隋书·经籍志》到《古今书录》,选本、评论著作的位置发生迁移,呈现出从选、评文章到选、评分列的总集观念动态演进,进一步为宋代总集观念的定型奠定了理论与实践基础。This paper analyzes the changes in the location of the selected books and reviews in the Tang Dynasty bibliography and inspects the development of the concept of Zongji in classical bibliography of the Tang Dynasty and recognizes the Tang Dynasty as the turning point. Suishu jingjizhi combines the category of Zongji and Zawen of Qilu into the category of Zongji, so that multiple and single stylistic selections, critical works, single and individual literary works are all allowed to join into the Zongji field, the concept of Zongji has been expanded. Gujin shulu compiled by Wu Jiong continues the category name of Zongji, but the documents are added or deleted, and the critical works have been consciously moved to the end of this category. From Suishu jingjizhi to Gujin shulu, the position of selections and critical works has changed, showing the dynamic evolution of the concept of Zongji from selecting and criticizing articles to separating selections and critical works, which further laid the theoretial and practical foundation for the stereotype of the concept of Zongji in the Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：《隋书·经籍志》 《古今书录》 总集观念 选本 评论 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]