检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁晨辉 张一[1] 程睿琪 陶润东 傅贵[1] YUAN Chenhui;ZHANG Yi;CHENG Ruiqi;TAO Rundong;FU Gui(School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学(北京)应急管理与安全工程学院,北京100083
出 处:《安全》2022年第11期32-38,共7页Safety & Security
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51534008);《安全科学与工程导论》课程建设项目(J20ZD03);中国矿业大学(北京)大学生创新训练项目资助(202112023)。
摘 要:为探究事故的共性原因,选取飞行事故和危化品爆炸事故作为研究对象,以事故致因“2-4”模型为分析工具,对2起案例的原因进行重新分析,得出两者在组织文化、管理体系、个体能力、个体动作4个阶段的事故原因。对比研究其共性原因,并以提高个体能力为目标导向,以解决组织文化和管理体系中存在的共性问题为主要思路,提出通用预防方法。研究表明:2起事故在组织文化、管理体系、个体能力均存在共性原因;分析得到针对2类事故、2类行业均适用的预防方法,为未来继续扩大研究样本从而探究适用于所有行业的通用事故预防方法提供理论支持。In order to explore the common causes of accidents,flight accidents and hazardous chemical explosion accidents are selected as the research objects,and the 24Model is used as the analysis tool to re-analyze the causes of the two cases.The accident causes of the two cases are obtained in the four stages of organizational culture,management system,individual ability,and individual actions.In order to improve the individual ability and solve the common problems existing in the organizational culture and management system,the common causes of the two accidents were compared and studied,and the general prevention methods were put forward.The results show that the two accident cases have common reasons in organizational culture,management system,and individual ability;The prevention methods applicable to both types of accidents and industries obtained from the analysis will provide theoretical support for the future expansion of the research sample to explore common accident prevention methods applicable to all industries.
关 键 词:飞行事故 危化品爆炸事故 “2-4”模型 共性原因 事故预防方法
分 类 号:X91[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145