突破既有樊篱的遮蔽——创造社与文学研究会论争新探  

Breaking the Cover of Existing Fences:A New Discussion of the Debate between the Creation Society and the Society for Literary Research

作　　者：魏建[1] Wei Jian

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《文史哲》2022年第6期117-129,164,共14页Literature,History,and Philosophy

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“中国近现代文学期刊全文数据库建设与研究”(17ZDA276)的阶段性成果;。

摘　　要：创造社与文学研究会的论争是现代文学史上特别重要的论争。此课题的先行研究留下了一些误以为解决、其实悬而未决的重要学术问题。本论文对这些问题做了新的考论。一、创造社何以称为“异军”?主要不是因为与文学研究会之“异”,而是从一开始就自“异”于新文学主流派。二、研究论争起源不应纠结于与谁关系更大,而应认真辨析各种相关矛盾恩怨的具体内涵和相互纠缠,从而深化对后来矛盾扩大升级的认识。三、论争发难的矛头只看到指向文学研究会是不够的。创造社更想挑战的是陈、胡、刘、钱、周。对号入座的应战者成了表面上的挑战对象。四、文人相轻和“才子+流氓”的印象遮蔽了对深层问题的认识。创造社的挑战有重要的文学史意义:为新文学突破新的话语霸权提供了机遇,给新文学思想价值格局带来了结构性的改变,以新“文学”修补“新”文学,带来了新的美学原则。The debate between the Creation Society and the Society for Literary Research is an important issue in the history of modern Chinese literature,yet former studies left many unsolved problems.This paper mainly focuses on the following problems.Firstly,the reason for the Creation Society becoming a force of anomaly does not lie in its difference with the Society for Literary Research,but in its attempt to differentiate itself from the main current of the“new literature.”Secondly,the implication and tangle of various contradictions should be paid more attention when discussing the origin of debate to understand the upgrading or expansion of contradictions more deeply.Thirdly,it was Chen Duxiu,Hu Shih,Liu Bannong,Qian Xuantong,and Zhou Zuoren that the Creation Society liked to challenge,yet who took the initiative to accept the challenge became the goal of“battle.”Fourthly,the challenge launched by the Creation Society is significant in modern literary history:it provided an opportunity for the new literature breaking new discourse hegemony,made structural change in ideology and value of the new literature,and brought new aesthetic principle.

关 键 词：创造社 文学研究会 论争 遮蔽 新文学 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]