争议焦点作为类案判断比较点之证立  

Argumentation on the Issue of Dispute Serving as Comparison Point for Similar Cases

作　　者：侯竣泰 HOU Juntai(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2022年第11期14-23,共10页Journal of Yibin University

摘　　要：类似案件类似裁判不仅是“同等情况同等对待”之形式正义的要求,也是公民朴素的正义观之需要,对于统一法律适用标准,在公民心中树立法律的权威具有较大价值。“类案类判”的司法实践必须找到类案判断的比较标准(即比较点),辅助法律适用者司法裁判。而案件事实说、法律说、裁判要点说与综合说均忽略了类案判断的实质是裁判欲解决问题与前案解决问题的比对。司法裁判的主要作用之一是解决争议,即解决诉讼各方之间的纠纷与问题,若前后两案的争议焦点类似,那么应将其判断为类案,从而作出类似处理。It is not only the requirement of formal justice of“equal treatment in the same cases”,but also the need of citizens’simple concept of justice,which is of great significance to unify the standards of legal application and establish the authority of law in citizens’mind.However,it is necessary to find a comparative standard(i.e.,comparison point)to support the judicial decision of judges.Case facts theory,law application theory,key judge points theory and the combination theory do not see the essence of the similar cases judgment which is the comparison between the problem the judge wants to solve and the problem solved in the previous case.One of the main roles of judicial adjudication is to solve disputes,that is,to solve disputes and problems between the parties.If the two cases have similar issues of dispute,then they should be judged as similar cases,so as to make similar treatments.

关 键 词：争议焦点 类案判断 类案判断比较点 法律关系 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]