基于主观评价和熵权-TOPSIS的虚拟试衣软件评价  

Evaluation of virtual fitting software based on subjective evaluation and Entropy-TOPSIS

作　　者：张莉[1] 许君 马大力[1] 蒋蕾 洪岩[2] ZHANG Li;XU Jun;MA Dali;JIANG Lei;HONG Yan(College of Textile Science and Engineering,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China;College of Textile and Clothing Engineering,Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215021,China)

机构地区：[1]天津工业大学纺织科学与工程学院,天津300387 [2]苏州大学纺织与服装工程学院,江苏苏州215021

出　　处：《毛纺科技》2022年第11期80-87,共8页Wool Textile Journal

基　　金：国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFB1308801)。

摘　　要：不同软件的虚拟试衣功能在服装制作过程、软件模块的功能设计、模型库的资源储备上都具有差异性,致使用户选择虚拟试衣软件时出现困难,文章采用主观和客观的虚拟试衣软件功能评估方法,为用户和研发企业提供选择依据。首先选择Vidya、Style3D、Clo3D软件分别制作同款虚拟衬衫,根据评价虚拟试衣功能的指标请专家评分,其次提出一种熵权-TOPSIS评价法客观评价软件的虚拟试衣功能,最后将得到的客观评价和主观评价2个结论进行对比分析。结果表明主客观评价法的结论一致,Vidya的综合评价模拟效果最强,Style3D的模拟速度最佳,Clo3D服装模拟多样性最优。The virtual fitting function of different software is different in garment making process,function design of software module and resource reserve of model library,which makes it difficult for virtual fitting experience users to choose virtual fitting software.In order to solve this problem,a subjective and objective evaluation method of virtual fitting software function is adopted in this paper to provide ideas and guidance for users and R&D enterprises.Firstly,Vidya,Style3D and Clo3D were selected to make the same kind of virtual shirts,and the indexes of virtual fitting function were obtained and evaluated by experts.Secondly,an entropy-TOPSIS evaluation method was proposed to objectively evaluate the virtual fitting function of the software.Finally,the objective evaluation and subjective evaluation were compared and analyzed.The resulTSshow that Vidya has the strongest comprehensive evaluation simulation effect,Style3D has the best simulation speed,Clo3D has the best diversity of clothing simulation,and the conclusions of subjective and objective evaluation methods are consistent.

关 键 词：3D服装 CAD技术 虚拟试衣 主观评价 熵权-TOPSIS 

分 类 号：TS941.26[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]