生物安全犯罪的法益侵害与规制路径  

Infringement Iinterests of Biosecurity Crime and Regulatory Path

作　　者：袁佳音 YUAN Jia-yin(School of Law,Southeast University,Nanjing 211102,China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,南京211102

出　　处：《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期714-723,共10页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“积极预防主义视野下生物安全风险的刑法规制研究”(编号:21BFX177)。

摘　　要：随着《生物安全法》的实施和《刑法修正案(十一)》中相关罪名的增加,生物安全犯罪成为学界关注的焦点。然而,目前生物安全犯罪还存在着行为边界模糊、侵害法益定位不明、规制路径不周延等诸多问题。对生物安全犯罪进行规范化分析和功能解读,是刑法规制生物安全风险的前提和客观需要。生物安全的侵害法益作为一种新兴法益,对其进行范畴归纳具有至关重要的意义。公民的合法权益和稳定的社会秩序是生物安全保障的应有之义和根本目的,生物安全法益理应归属于刑法中的公共安全法益范畴。在规制生物安全犯罪的路径上,一方面为防止生物安全风险的无限扩大严重危害公共安全,刑法应当秉持积极预防主义,防患于未然,另一方面应坚持多法衔接,构筑完善的生物安全犯罪防范体系,从而为保障生物安全起到保驾护航的法律作用。With the implementation of the Biosafety Law and the increase of related charges in the Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China,biosecurity crime has become the focus of academic attention.However,there are still many problems,such as fuzzy behavior boundary,unclear positioning of in-fringement of legal interests system,and irregular regulatory path.Standardized analysis and functional interpret-ation of biosecurity crimes are the premise and objective need of criminal law to regulate biosafety risks.It is of vital significance to categorize this new legal interest biosecurity infringement.The legitimate rights and in-terests of citizens and the stable social order are the meaning and purpose of biosecurity guarantee,and the legal interest of biosecurity should belong to the category of public security’s legal interest in criminal law.On the one hand,in order to prevent the unlimited expansion of biosecurity risks from seriously endangering public security,the criminal law should uphold active preventions and precautions.On the other hand,we should adhere to the convergence of multiple laws and build a perfect biosecurity crime prevention system,thus playing a legal role in protecting biosecurity.

关 键 词：行为样态 侵害法益 积极预防主义 犯罪防范体系 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]