域外陪审制度历史渊源考辨  

A Diachronic Study on the Origin of Foreign Jury Systems

作　　者：陈颖[1] 黄晋 Chen Ying;Huang Jin(School of Law,Humanities and Sociology,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430070,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学法学与人文社会学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《河北工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期73-78,85,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC820009)的阶段性成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(181413003)。

摘　　要：欧洲大陆的封建王室和天主教会为了巩固司法领域的集权统治,联手促成了参审制的诞生。与之相对,英美新兴资本集团和新教教会为了获得法律对私人资本的确认和保护,共同推动了大陪审团制的形成。日本的裁判员制度和韩国的国民参与审判制度均是外交妥协和政治博弈的产物,并不是日韩两国历史自然演进的结果。日韩两国施行该制度的时间尚不足二十年,并未积累足够的实践经验,实施效果也难以评估。In order to consolidate the centralized rule in the judicial field,the feudal monarchy and the Catholic Church on the European continent jointly promoted the birth of the assessor system.In contrast,the emerging Anglo-Saxon capital group and Protestant church jointly promoted the formation of grand jury system to obtain the legal recognition and protection of private capital.Japanese Saibanin trial system and South Korean citizen's participation in trial system are the results of diplomatic compromise and political game,not the results of historical evolution of Japan and South Korea.Japan and South Korea have implemented this system for less than 20 years,so they have not accumulated enough practical experience and the implementation effect is difficult to evaluate.

关 键 词：陪审制度 宗教 封建王权 资本集团 政治博弈 

分 类 号：D93/97[政治法律—法学]