从冲突到调和: 《商标法》第四条第一款的解读  

From Conflict to Reconciliation: Interpretation of Paragraph 1 of Article 4 of the Trademark Law

作　　者：李金潇 Li Jinxiao(School of Intellectual Property,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学知识产权学院,北京100049

出　　处：《河北工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期79-85,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：通过分析《商标法》第四条第一款的内在逻辑和相关条文之间的关系,可以发现“修饰说”的观点更有利于打击商标囤积行为、抑制商标恶意注册。在《商标法》修改之后,“不以使用为目的的恶意商标注册”应从该兜底条款中脱离出去,成为独立的事由,原有的“其他不正当手段”这一兜底条款的外延也应随之发生变化。在“损害他人现有在先权利”与“非使用目的的恶意注册”两种情形兼而有之的情况下,第四条第一款比第三十二条的适用空间更为广泛。我国《商标法》对于防御商标的保护模式尚不成熟,在理解《商标法》第四条第一款时,无须考虑防御商标的相关问题。By analyzing the internal logic of Paragraph 1,Article 4 of the Trademark Law and the relationship about related provisions,we can find that the"decoration"view is more conducive to combating trademark hoarding and inhibiting malicious registration of trademarks.Since the amendment of"Trademark Law",the"malicious and not filed for the purpose of use"has been separated from this clause and become an independent cause.The extension of the original"other improper means"miscellaneous provision in Article 32 has also been changed.In the case of a combination of"damaging the existing prior rights of others"and"malicious and not filed for the purpose of use",the paragraph 1,Article 4 has a broader scope of application than Article 32.The protection model of Trademark Law for defensive trademarks is still immature in China.In understanding the paragraph 1,Article 4 of the Trademark Law,we no longer need to consider the issues about defensive trademarks.

关 键 词：不以使用为目的 恶意注册 商标囤积 防御商标 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]