历史规律与历史决定论的证成与辩护——驳西方学者对唯物史观历史决定论的诘难  

Evidence and Defense of Historical Law and Historical Determinism:Refuting Western Scholars’Criticism of Materialist Historical Determinism

作　　者：阎孟伟 Yan Mengwei

机构地区：[1]南开大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《社会科学辑刊》2022年第6期45-54,共10页Social Science Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(ZD&21015)。

摘　　要：承认还是否认历史规律的客观存在是历史决定论与历史非决定论的根本分歧。历史唯物主义理论最突出的贡献就在于揭示了人类社会及其历史发展的客观本质和普遍规律,因而是当代历史哲学中最具代表性的历史决定论。在当代西方历史哲学中,以李凯尔特、克罗齐、波普等为代表的西方学者就是通过对历史学中“个别与一般”的关系和“历史的因果性”等问题的分析,否定历史规律的客观存在,进而质疑和否定历史唯物主义的决定论历史观。当代某些马克思主义哲学家也力图把历史唯物主义说成是历史非决定论,通过否定历史规律来质疑马克思的历史唯物主义理论,但这样做的结果实际上是否定了历史唯物主义本身。当代历史非决定论对我国学界也产生了深刻的影响,出现了一些值得关注的思想倾向。To admit or deny the objective existence of the historical law is the fundamental analysis of historical determinism and historical non-determinism.The most outstanding contribution of historical materialism theory lies in revealing the objective nature and universal law of human society and its historical development,so it is the most representative historical determinism in the contemporary historical philosophy.In contemporary Western historical philosophy,Western scholars such as Heinrich John Rickert,Benedetto Croce and Karl Popper deny the objective existence of the law of history by analyzing the relationship between“individual and general”and the problem of“causality of history”,and then question and deny the deterministic historical view of historical materialism.Some contemporary Marxist philosophers also try to describe historical materialism as historical non-determinism,but the result of this is actually a denial of historical materialism itself.Contemporary historical non-determinism has also exerted a profound influence on Chinese academic circles,and some ideological tendencies are worth paying attention to.

关 键 词：历史规律 历史决定论 历史非决定论 个别论历史观 历史因果性 

分 类 号：B0[哲学宗教—哲学理论]