杜甫华州去官是弃官还是流放?  

Did Du Fu Abandon His Official Position or Was He Banished in Huazhou

作　　者：张起[1] 邱永旭[2] Zhang Qi;Qiu Yongxu

机构地区：[1]成都大学文学与新闻传播学院、成都大学文明互鉴与“一带一路”研究中心,四川成都610106 [2]西华师范大学文学院,四川南充637009

出　　处：《中州学刊》2022年第11期137-146,共10页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：成都大学天府文化研究院“天府文化研究与文创课题”项目“唐诗夜航”(TYB202201)。

摘　　要：杜甫华州去官长期以来均遵从历史定评,即“弃官逃荒说”。这种说法来自《旧唐书》和《新唐书》的杜甫本传,但两书所载皆有重大缺漏,故此说实为谬误。杜甫本出自肃宗一派,但在房琯事件中,他从儒家伦理出发,反对肃宗清洗旧臣,以疏救房琯表达对玄宗的支持,继而引发对肃宗擅自继位的质疑。因此,杜甫被肃宗罢官,再流放陇蜀,直至代宗继位,才得以复官。杜甫为“尊者讳”的三首“杜鹃诗”即为佐证。It has long been subject to historical judgment that Du Fu’s leaving office in Huazhou was that he quit and fled from famine,as was stated in the original biography of Old History of Tang and New History of Tang,but both books had serious flaws and were fallacious.Du Fu was originally in league with Emperor Su Zong,but in Fang Guan Event,out of Confucian ethics,he opposed Su Zong to clean up the old ministers and supported Emperor Xuan Zong in the manner of rescuing Fang Guan,which aroused the questioning of Su Zong’s unauthorized succession.Du Fu was hence dismissed by Su Zong,exiled to Gansu and Sichuan and not reinstated in office until Emperor Dai Zong ascended the throne.Du Fu’s three“Cuckoo poems”which applied with other appellations instead of the names of those respected are the evidence.

关 键 词：杜甫 华州 罢官 流放 考释 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]