检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶正国[1,2] YE Zhengguo(Associate Professor of China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies,Research Fellow of Legal Research Center of Cross-Strait,Hong Kong and Macao,Wuhan University,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院 [2]武汉大学两岸及港澳法制研究中心
出 处:《中华海洋法学评论》2022年第3期148-179,共32页China Oceans Law Review
基 金:2022年国家社科基金年度项目(项目编号:22BGJ013)阶段性成果。
摘 要:两岸维护南海权益必须处理好共同政治基础和法律协调的关系。法律协调应从国际法、宪制性规定和内部具体规定等方面进行。解困身份张力的国际法基础主要包括探求两岸在南海地位规范的共同立场,我国台湾地区参与部分国际法权能,化解两岸国际法渊源分歧。在以两岸“根本法”为中心夯实“一中南海”的政治基础上,实现“固有疆域”与U形线规范认知互补,构建分类处理的落实机制。完善两岸涉南海具体规定的技术调和有关机制,如信息机制、组织机制、授权机制、程序机制和商谈机制等。The collaboration between the Cross-Strait on the South China Sea must deal with the relations between mutual political foundation and legal coordination.The collaboration should get on legal coordination according to modern international law,constitutional laws and internal regulations.The basis of international law for resolving the identity tension,mainly includes the common norm position in the South China Sea,China’s Taiwan region’s participation powers,and the divergence of international laws.Besides,laying the political foundation solid for“One China Including the Cross-Strait on the South China Sea Issue”as well as constructing legal norms centering on the Cross-Strait’s fundamental law.Moreover,improving relevant approaches to harmonize normal and technical conflicts within the rule system on the South China Sea between the Cross-Strait,such as information mechanism,organization mechanism,authorization mechanism,procedure mechanism and negotiation mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.179.141