创新视角下标准必要专利许可费分摊方法探析  

Analysis on the Apportionment Rule of Standard Essential Patent Royalty with the View of Innovation

作　　者：唐春[1] 陈菲 Tang Chun;Chen Fei

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院 [2]北京隆诺律师事务所

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2022年第10期108-118,共11页Electronics Intellectual Property

基　　金：华东政法大学校科研项目“标准必要专利相关司法问题研究”(项目编号:20HZK010)。

摘　　要：标准必要专利许可费如何确定才符合FRAND要求?目前尚缺乏明确的法律依据和公认可遵循的司法标准,亟待研究。基于国内外现有制度与司法实践的研究,首先讨论计算标准必要专利许可费的分摊原则,其次根据“驱动范围”标准区分“整体市场价值”和“最小可销售单元”这两种费基,然后通过比较分析最常见的可比协议法、Top-down法这两种费率计算法,提出根据不同产品类型确定费基和费率的方法,最后基于“整体市场价值”型费基,提出可比-Top-down优化费率计算的方法:先用可避免许可费堆叠的Top-down法算出费率区间,再利用体现市场调整优先和避免专利劫持的可比协议法,在此费率区间内进一步确定费率。How can the standard essential patent royalty meet FRAND rule?There is still a lack of clear legal basis and recognized judicial rules that can be followed at present.According to the research of existing domestic and foreign law and judicial practices,there is one method with three steps to obtain a reasonable patent royalty.Firstly,to discuss the Apportionment Rule of standard essential patent royalty calculation.Secondly,to distinguish two royalty bases of“the Entire Market Value Rule”and“the Smallest Saleable Patent Practicing Unit Rule”based on the“drive scope”standard.And then to determine the royalty base and royalty rate according to different product types,by analyzing the Comparable Agreement rule and the Topdown rule.Finally,based on the"the Entire Market Value Rule",put forward a Comparable-Top-down of royalty rate calculation method:applying the Top-down rule that can avoid royalty stacking to calculate the range of rate,and then using the comparable agreement rule that reflects the priority of market adjustment and avoids patent hold-up to gain a specific royalty rate.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 FRAND许可费 分摊原则 可比协议法 TOP-DOWN 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]