检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万勇[1] Wan Yong
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2022年第4期92-102,共11页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“健全以公平为原则的产权保护制度研究”(项目编号:20ZDA049)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:国际版权制度的百年变迁史就是一部技术进步史。作为世界创新重镇的美国,无论是成文法还是判例法,采用的都是技术创新友好型的版权法律应对举措。欧盟的优势在于内容产业而非互联网产业,因应技术创新的路径与美国不同。面对新一轮科技革命与产业变革,中国《著作权法》在第三次修订过程中也作出了回应,对作品定义、著作财产权、“合理使用”条款作了修改,但是有些规定仍存在一些问题,不能有效应对技术创新。未来,中国版权制度改革的基本思路应当是:立足本国国情,以促进技术创新为著作权立法与司法导向,立法上更多采用开放式条款或标准型规范,司法上更好地发挥司法能动作用。The one-hundred years’history of changes in the international copyright system is a history of technological progress.As an important innovation place in the world,the United States adopts technological innovation friendly copyright law measures,both in legislative area and judicial area.The advantage of the E.U.lies in the content industry,not the internet industry,and consequently the path of technological innovation is different from that of the United States.In the face of a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation,Chinese Copyright Law also responded in the third revision process,revising the definition of works,economic rights and fair use.However,there are still some problems in several provisions,which cannot effectively respond to technological innovation.In the future,the basic ideas of copyright legal system reform should be the following:promoting technological innovation as the copyright legislative and judicial guidance,based on the national conditions;adopting more open clauses or standards in legislation,and giving better play to judicial activism in justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.149.192