国际法院指示临时措施研究  

Research on Provisional Measures Indicated by the International Court of Justice

作　　者：王孔祥[1] WANG Kongxiang

机构地区：[1]国际关系学院法律系

出　　处：《武大国际法评论》2022年第4期101-122,共22页Wuhan University International Law Review

摘　　要：作为国际法院在诉讼过程中的一种附带程序,指示临时措施的实践在冷战后增长迅速。国际法院指示临时措施须满足具备初步管辖权、随后所作判决主体的权利面临直接危险等条件。被请求国不出庭,不妨碍国际法院指示临时措施。国际法院指示的临时措施,有一些未能得到当事国的执行,有一些可能提前介入案件的实质阶段。从当事国的角度,启动该程序可能确实出于情势紧急之需要,也可能是出于诉讼策略的考虑。从国际法院的角度,需要对指示临时措施的程序加以完善。As an incidental procedure in the litigation process,the instructing of provisional measures by the International Court of Justice is increasing rapidly since the end of the Cold War.The indication of provisional measures must meet the following requirements:(1)the ICJ has prima facie jurisdiction;(2)the subject of contending cases are facing direct danger,etc.The failure of the requested countries to appear in the Court does not prevent the ICJ from instructing provisional measures.Some of the provisional measures ordered by the ICJ have not been implemented by the countries concerned,and some may be intervened early in the substantive stage of the case.From the perspective of the countries concerned,the initiation of the procedure of indicating provisional measures should indeed be in urgent need of the situation,or it may be based on their litigation strategy or tactical considerations.From the perspective of the ICJ,the procedure of the indicating of provisional measures needs to be reformed and improved.

关 键 词：国际法院 临时措施 初步管辖权 附带程序 

分 类 号：D994[政治法律—国际法学]