基于uMARS量表的运动健身APP功能和质量评价  

Function and Quality Evaluation of Sports Fitness APP Based on uMARS Scale

作　　者：陈洁红 刘红美 吴佳奇 陈文文 刘文慧 马春花 CHEN Jiehong;LIU Hongmei;WU Jiaqi;CHEN Wenwen;LIU Wenhui;MA Chunhua(School of Nursing,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou,Guangdong Province,510180 China;Neurosurgery Department,Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital,Huizhou,Guangdong Province,516001 China)

机构地区：[1]广州医科大学护理学院,广东广州510180 [2]惠州市中心人民医院神经外科,广东惠州516001

出　　处：《当代体育科技》2022年第30期175-182,共8页Contemporary Sports Technology

基　　金：广东医学科研基金(A2020087)。

摘　　要：目的:该研究旨在评估我国运动健身APP的功能和质量,并探究商店用户评分、主要功能评分和用户版移动应用程序评级量表(uMARS)的关系。方法:通过七麦数据搜索运动、健身等关键词,对App Store、应用宝、360商城中提供运动健身指导的APP进行了筛选。下载于2018年1月1日至2020年9月27日更新的应用,收集APP的用户评分、下载量、最新版本号、开发商及应用平台等基本特征,整合归纳APP的主要功能,根据每个功能计1分的形式得出每个APP的功能评分,并由2名评估者采用uMARS量表对运动健身APP进行质量评估。结果:共筛查816个应用程序,39个应用程序与运动健身相关,将其纳入分析,得出uMARS平均分为3.34±0.81分(满分为5分),分值在1.56~4.58之间。uMARS中功能维度得分最高为3.49分,用户参与维度得分最低为3.12分,美学维度平均得分为3.47分,信息维度平均分为3.27分。APP的功能评分为8.00分,分值在2~13之间。运动健身APP的功能评分与uMARS评分具有统计学意义,P<0.01,存在非常显著性差异。功能数量可以客观反映出应用程序的质量,但用户评分与uMARS评分无统计学意义,P>0.05。结论:uMARS量表能够较好地反映运动健身APP的整体质量水平和个体差异。运动健身APP质量尚可,但仍有较大改进空间,未来需进一步开发功能完善、提高用户参与度的APP,并注重提高内容的科学性和实用性。Objective:To evaluate the function and quality of sports fitness apps in China,and explore the relationship between store user ratings,main function ratings,and user version mobile application rating scale(uMARS).Methods:Mobile APPs providing fitness guidance were screened in APP store,Appbao and 360 Mall,using stepwise searching criteria by the keywords"excercise"and"fitness"through Qimai data.Download the application updated from January 1,2018 to September 27,2020,collect the APP's user ratings,downloads,latest version number,developers and application platforms and other basic features,integrate and summarize the main functions of the APP,and obtain the function score of each APP in the form of 1 point for each function,and two evaluators use the uMARS scale to evaluate the quality of the sports fitness APP.Results:A total of 816 applications were screened,39 applications were included in the analysis related to exercise and fitness,and the average uMARS score was 3.34±0.81(full score was 5 points),with a score between 1.56 and 4.58.In uMARS,the highest score of functional dimension is 3.49,the lowest score of user participation dimension is 3.12,the average score of aesthetic dimension is 3.47,and the average score of information dimension is 3.27.The function score of APP is 8.00,ranging from 2 to 13.The function score of sports fitness APP and uMARS score were statistically significant(P<0.01).The number of functions can objectively reflect the quality of the application,but there is no statistically significant difference between the user's score and uMARS score(P>0.05).Conclusion:The uMARS scale can better reflect the overall quality level and individual differences of sports fitness APP.The quality of sports fitness APP is acceptable,but there is still much room for improvement.In the future,it is necessary to further develop APP with perfect functions,improve user participation,and focus on improving the scientific and practical content.

关 键 词：应用程序 运动 用户版移动应用程序评级量表 质量评估 

分 类 号：G804[文化科学—运动人体科学]