检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴颖雄[1,2] 季宝轶 Wu Yingxiong;Ji Baoyi
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学 [2]中国药科大学 [3]南京医学会
出 处:《医学与法学》2022年第6期66-70,共5页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:学界关于中医师处方权的权利行使边界争议不少,论争点主要为中医师是否享有开具西药的权力及其界限。本文分析“中医师处方权”的内涵及其法律性质,结合我国基本医疗服务的特点提出完善我国中医师处方权法律规制的建议,即重新设计符合国情的医师执业类别,重构中医处方权的权利主体,合理界定中医师处方权的权利行使范围。There are a lot of disputes in the academic circle about the exercise boundary of TCM physicians'prescribing right,and the main point of contention is whether TCM physicians have the right to prescribe western medicine and its boundary.This paper analyzes the connotation and legal attributes of"TCM physicians'prescribing right",and puts forward some suggestions to improve the legal regulation of TCM physicians'prescribing right in com⁃bination with the characteristics of basic medical services in China,i.e,redesigning the practice category of physi⁃cians in line with the national conditions,reconstructing the right subject of TCM prescribing right,and reasonably defining the exercise scope of TCM physicians'prescribing right.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.211.185