医疗纠纷第三方调解运作模式比较研究——基于广东省三种典型模式的分析  

A comparative study on the operation modes of third-party mediation in medical disputes——Based on the analysis of three typical models in Guangdong Province

作　　者：梁贵钦 翟方明 Liang Guiqin;Zhai Fangming(Humanities and Management School of Guangdong Medical University,Dongguan,Guangdong 523808,China)

机构地区：[1]广东医科大学人文与管理学院,广东东莞市523808

出　　处：《中国卫生法制》2022年第6期26-29,共4页China Health Law

基　　金：2020年广东省科技创新战略专项资金项目“广东省医疗纠纷第三方调解机制优化研究——以调解组织模式比较为中心”(pdjh2020b0269);2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于公平与可持续理念的基本医疗保险制度整合研究”(17YJC820063)。

摘　　要：作为医疗纠纷的一种有效处理机制,第三方调解近些年在我国迅速发展。不同的第三方调解运作模式不仅影响调解机构的独立性,也影响调解结果有效性。广东省医疗纠纷第三方调解目前主要存在三种典型模式:市场化运作模式、政府购买模式和民营第三方模式。由民营组织自行筹集经费来源,保证了医调委的公正性、独立性,同时也因资金的不稳定影响机构运作效率。通过比较分析这三种调解模式的各自优劣之处,提出不同模式之间需要相互借鉴、取长补短,以便进一步优化自身的运作机制。As an effective mechanism to deal with medical disputes,third-party mediation has developed rapidly in China in recent years.Different third-party mediation operation modes not only affect the independence of mediation institutions,but also affect the effectiveness of mediation results.At present,there are three typical modes of third-party mediation of medical disputes in Guangdong Province:market-oriented operation mode,government purchase mode and private third-party mode.By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of these three mediation models,it is considered that different models need to learn from each other in order to further optimize their own operation mechanism.

关 键 词：医疗纠纷 第三方调解 市场化运作模式 政府购买模式 民营第三方模式 

分 类 号：D902[政治法律—法学理论]