Spatio-temporal accuracy evaluation of MSWEP daily precipitation over the Huaihe River Basin,China:A comparison study with representative satellite-and reanalysis-based products  被引量:4

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:LI Lingjie WANG Yintang WANG Leizhi HU Qingfang ZHU Zhenduo LI Liping LI Chengxi 

机构地区:[1]State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering Science,Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,Nanjing 210029,China [2]Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development,Nanjing 210098,China [3]Department of Civil,Structural and Environmental Engineering,University at Buffalo,The State University of New York,Buffalo,NY 14220,USA [4]Lvliang Meteorology Bureau of Shanxi Province,Lishi 033000,Shanxi,China [5]La Salle College Preparatory,Pasadena,CA 91107,USA

出  处:《Journal of Geographical Sciences》2022年第11期2271-2290,共20页地理学报(英文版)

基  金:National Key R&D Program of China,No.2021YFC3000104;National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.52009081,No.51479118;Special Funded Project for Basic Scientific Research Operation Expenses of the Central Public Welfare Scientific Research Institutes of China,No.Y519006。

摘  要:Multi-source weighted-ensemble precipitation(MSWEP)is one of the most popular merged global precipitation products with long-term spanning and high spatial resolution.While various studies have acknowledged its ability to accurately estimate precipitation in terms of temporal dynamics,its performance regarding spatial pattern and extreme rainfall is overlooked.To fill this knowledge gap,the daily precipitation of two versions of MSWEP(MSWEP V2.1&V2.2)are compared with that of three representative satellite-and reanalysis-based products,namely the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission(TRMM 3B42 V7),the climate prediction center morphing technique satellite-gauge merged product(CMORPH BLD),and the fifth-generation reanalysis product of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts(ERA5).The comparison is made according to the dense daily rainfall observations from 539 rain gauges over the Huaihe River Basin in China during 2006–2015.The results show that MSWEP V2.1,MSWEP V2.2 and CMORPH BLD have better performance on temporal accuracy of precipitation estimation,followed by ERA5 and TRMM 3B42V7.MSWEPs yield the most even spatial distribution across the basin since it takes full advantage of the multi datasets.As the weighted-ensemble method is independently carried out on each grid in MSWEPs,the spatial distribution of local precipitation is changed by different source data,which results in that MSWEPs perform worse than CMORPH BLD in terms of the representation of precipitation spatial pattern.In addition,the capability of MSWEPs to describe the spatial structure in the rainy season is lower than that in the dry season.Strong precipitation(≥100 mm/d)events are better represented in TRMM 3B42 V7 products than in MSWEPs.Finally,based on the comparison results,we suggest to improve the merging algorithm of MSWEP by considering the precipitation spatial self-correlation and adjusting the merging weights based on the performance of the source datasets under different precipitation intensities.

关 键 词:MSWEP temporal accuracy spatial pattern extreme precipitation Huaihe River Basin 

分 类 号:P333[天文地球—水文科学] P426.6[水利工程—水文学及水资源]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象