经济思想史视角下对健全财政的批判性反思  

A Critical Reflection on Sound Finance from the Perspective of History of Economic Thought

作　　者：兰无双 贾根良[2] Lan Wu-shuang;Jia Gen-liang(School of Economics,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070;School of Economics,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学经济学院,北京100070 [2]中国人民大学经济学院,北京100872

出　　处：《经济纵横》2022年第10期19-26,共8页Economic Review Journal

基　　金：首都经济贸易大学青年教师科研启动基金项目“经济学学界史研究的社会学方法和经济学方法探究”(编号:XRZ2021056)的成果。

摘　　要：健全财政是西方国家历史上长期居于支配地位的正统财政观念,在凯恩斯革命之后逐渐受到功能财政的挑战。梳理这段历史可以发现,健全财政以平衡预算为核心,把政府预算比作家庭预算,要求限制政府支出。健全财政思想从古典经济学和新古典经济学中获得了强有力的理论支持,国家的非生产性、无障碍传统、杜尔哥—斯密传统和货币中性论等理论观念,为以平衡预算、限制政府财政为核心的健全财政思想提供了全面的理论辩护。凯恩斯革命摧毁了健全财政的理论支撑,勒纳的功能财政理论树立了一种全新的财政观,健全财政思想在历史上第一次遇到挑战,而现代货币理论则进一步揭示了健全财政的错误观念。Sound finance is an orthodox financial concept that has been dominant in the history of western countries for a long time. It was gradually challenged by functional finance after the Keynesian revolution. A review of this history shows that the core of sound finance is to balance the budget, compare the government budget to the household budget, and require limiting government expenditure. The sound finance thought has obtained strong theoretical support from classical economics and neo-classical economics. The states’ non-productive, barrier free tradition, Turgot-Smith tradition, monetary neutrality and other theoretical concepts provide a comprehensive theoretical defense for the sound finance thought with balanced budget and limited government finance as the core. Keynesian revolution destroyed the theoretical support of sound finance, and Lerner’s functional finance theory set up a new view of finance. Sound finance thought was challenged for the first time in history, while modern monetary theory further revealed the wrong idea of sound finance.

关 键 词：健全财政 功能财政 凯恩斯革命 现代货币理论 经济思想史 

分 类 号：F831[经济管理—金融学]