缅甸民族和谈事件的政治符号学分析:表示、表现与表征  

Political Semiosis of Myanmar Peace Talks:Demonstrative,Performative and Representational Elements

作　　者：伍庆祥 范宏伟[1] Wu Qingxiang;Fan Hongwei

机构地区：[1]厦门大学东南亚研究中心/南洋研究院,厦门市361005

出　　处：《民族研究》2022年第5期57-70,M0003,M0004,共16页Ethno-National Studies

摘　　要：缅甸自1948年独立以来爆发的民族冲突被称为“世界上最长的内战”。和谈是影响缅甸民族冲突问题走向的关键节点,也是缅甸民族冲突的具体化与集中体现。本文通过政治符号学的表示元素(事件的语境)、表现元素(事件中的言行)与表征元素(事件所产生的意义)三个层面对缅甸转型以来,即2011-2020年10年间的民族和谈事件进行分析。和谈难以继续推进的原因主要在于,全国停火协议形成的机制限制了和谈的空间,民族地方武装与国防军之间两种联邦主义的对立表现,以及最为核心的“彬龙精神”与“三大责任”之间的表征矛盾被激发出来。Myanmar’s ethnic conflicts have never ended since its independence in 1948and are called "the longest civil war in the world".The peace talks are not only the critical junctures that influence the direction of its ethnic conflicts,but also the manifestation of its ethnic conflicts.This paper analyzes Myanmar’s ethnic peace talks since its political transition from 2011to 2020through three elements of political semiotics:the demonstrative(the context of the event),the performative(the speech act of the event)and the representational(the meaning generated by the event).There are mainly three reasons contributing to the difficulty in advancing the peace talks:the space of peace talks limited by Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement;opposite federal claims between ethnic armed organizations and national defense forces;and the representational contradictions triggered between "Panglong Spirit" and " Three Main National Causes".

关 键 词：缅甸 民族和谈 事件 民族冲突 民族和解 

分 类 号：D733.7[政治法律—政治学]