顾颉刚与王国维治史理念的差异及学术启示  

Difference between Gu Jiegang′s and Wang Guowei′s Historiographic Concepts and Its Enlightenment

作　　者：乔治忠[1] QIAO Zhi-zhong(School of Social Development,Langfang Normal University,Langfang Hebei 065000,China)

机构地区：[1]廊坊师范学院社会发展学院,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期53-59,共7页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：中国近代历史学的发展,主要矛盾是持续求新的趋向与力图守旧的势力之间的矛盾。顾颉刚与王国维是这两种史学取向博弈的代表性人物,对二人的治史理念予以比较十分必要。顾颉刚的治史理念是要打破上古旧史叙述的失实体系,具有“疑古”的特色;王国维则利用其某些考据成果,为信古思想张目。二者相比,高下立分。信古者有责任为其所信之史举证,但却大多逃避,仅能攻击疑古之说的所谓证据不足。王国维虽然能够以考据为古史举证,但论述之间充满逻辑荒谬。此后,信古派的论述,逻辑荒唐者频出,每况愈下,直至今日。The main contradiction in the development of modern Chinese historiography is the contradiction between the continuous trend of seeking new things and the forces trying to keep the old way.Gu Jiegang and Wang Guowei are representative figures in these two historical orientation games.It is necessary to compare their different historical concepts.Gu Jiegang′s concept of histori⁃ography is to break the unreal narrative of the ancient history system,and has the characteristics of"doubting ancient history".Wang Guowei used some of his research results to advocate for traditional thought on ancient history.The advantages and disadvan⁃tages are obvious in comparison.Those who believe in traditional historiography have the responsibility to provide evidence for the history they believe,but most of them evade it,and can only attack the so-called lack of evidence that doubts the ancient history.Though Wang Guowei can provide evidence for ancient history,the arguments are full of logical absurdities.Since then,arguments of those who believe in traditional historiography are full of logical absurdities,and the situation has deteriorated to this day.

关 键 词：顾颉刚 王国维 治史理念 举证 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]