“数据安全法益”命题下虚拟财产犯罪的归责路径重构  

On the Reconstruction of the Imputation Path for Crimes against Virtual Property under the Proposition of"Data Security as the Legal Interest"

作　　者：阎二鹏[1] YAN Erpeng

机构地区：[1]海南大学法学院,海南海口570228

出　　处：《政治与法律》2022年第12期45-59,共15页Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“新型网络犯罪对传统刑事法理论的突破与应对研究”(项目编号:2019FBX062)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：我国当下围绕虚拟财产犯罪形成的数据犯罪与财产犯罪认定路径,在前提认知上缺失了对数据犯罪保护法益的考量,进而造成对数据的形式化认识误区;既有关于“数据安全法益”内涵的技术属性解读,无法证成狭义数据犯罪的立法价值,亦无法与传统法益相区分,需要在规范意义上重塑数据安全法益的内涵;虚拟财产借助“财产性利益”的抽象表达已成为杂糅数据与财产的高度含混的范畴,应根据数据体现的利益属性进行类型化限缩解释;围绕典型的虚拟财产犯罪,应在承认数据安全法益独立地位的前提下,厘清其罪数形态,摒弃竞合论的主张,同时,在财产犯罪内部证成“转移占有”的行为要素。The current approach of determining data crimes and property crimes formed around crimes against virtual property in China is short of the consideration of the legal interest protected through combating data crime on the premise of cognition, which leads to a misconception of the formal understanding of data;The interpretation of the technical attribute of the connotation of "data security as the legal interest" cannot justify the legislative value of data crimes in a narrow sense, nor can it be differentiated from traditional legal interests, thus it is necessary to reshape the connotation of data security as the legal interest in a normative sense. Virtual property, with the help of abstract expression of "property interest", has become a highly ambiguous category of mixing data and property, and should be interpreted in a categorized and limited way according to the interest attribute reflected by the data;Regarding typical crimes against virtual property, it is necessary, on the premise of recognizing the independent status of data security as the legal interest, to clarify the number of charges and discard the doctrine of concurrence, and meanwhile, to prove the behavioral element of "occupation transfer" within the property crime.

关 键 词：虚拟财产数据 非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪 财产犯罪 

分 类 号：DF623[政治法律—刑法学]