检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵秉志 袁彬 Zhao Bingzhi;Yuan Bin
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院 [2]国际刑法学协会中国分会 [3]中国刑法学研究会
出 处:《江海学刊》2022年第6期160-168,256,共10页Jianghai Academic Journal
摘 要:我国死刑制度改革已取得令人瞩目的成就。从刑事一体化的视角看,我国在死刑的适用条件、适用对象、适用范围、适用标准、核准程序等方面仍存在自身规定不合理、不同规定不协调的问题,同时死刑的实体规定与死刑的程序、证据和执行规定之间也存在一定的冲突,社会治安形势、社会公众舆论等外部因素对死刑改革也有重要影响。刑事一体化要求死刑改革同时保持刑法的内在一致性和刑法与其他领域的外在协调性。我国应当进一步确立刑事一体化立场,由刑法之内到刑法之外,既改革死刑的刑法规定,也改革死刑的其他刑事法律和非刑事法律的配套规定,并通过合理的制度建设引导社会民众死刑观念的理性发展。The reform of the death penalty system in our country has made remarkable achievements.From the perspective of criminal integration,there are still problems such as unreasonable provisions and incoherence between different provisions in criminal law regarding the applicable conditions,applicable objects,applicable scope,applicable standards,and approval procedures of the death penalty.There are also certain conflicts between the procedures,evidence and enforcement regulations of the death penalty.China should further establish an integrated position,from the inside of the criminal law to the outside of the criminal law,reform not only the criminal law provisions of the death penalty,but also the supporting provisions of other criminal laws and non-criminal laws of the death penalty,and guide rational development of the public’s concept of the death penalty through reasonable system construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51