碳捕集与封存技术实施中环境侵权的法律救济研究  

Legal Remedies for Environmental Infringement Caused by the Implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

作　　者：赵鑫鑫 Zhao Xinxin

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院法律系,南京210094

出　　处：《学海》2022年第6期106-115,共10页Academia Bimestris

基　　金：江苏省社科基金项目“长三角区域流域生态补偿法治问题研究”(项目号:19FXD002)的阶段性成果;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No.30919013239)。

摘　　要：“双碳”目标的提出和落实推动了碳捕集与封存技术的迅速发展,但技术实施中不容忽视的环境风险需要明确有效的法律救济机制。在降低和减少该技术的负面效应,平衡公共利益与私人利益方面,美国的妨害诉讼理论以及气候变化诉讼中采用司法审查的做法具有借鉴意义。为在该项技术大规模示范与产业化集群建设中争取最大减排效益,同时充分保障公民的合法权益,我国应当着眼于提高法律救济的实效,将该项技术纳入实现“双碳”目标的整体治理框架中,通过司法路径和行政路径,在更为宏观的层面完善和优化环境侵权的法律救济机制。The proposal and implementation of the“dual carbon”goal has promoted the rapid development of medium-and long-term emission reduction technologies such as carbon capture and storage.However,the environmental risks that cannot be ignored in the implementation of technologies urge the need for an express and effective legal remedy mechanism.In terms of mitigating and reducing the negative effects of technologies and balancing public and private interests,the nuisance litigation theory of the US and judicial review in climate change litigation can play positive roles.In order to strive for maximum emission reduction benefits in the large-scale demonstration of this technology and the construction of industrialized clusters,and at the same time fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of individual citizens,it is necessary to improve the effectiveness of legal remedies,incorporate this technology into the overall governance framework to achieve the“dual carbon”goal in China,and improve and optimize the legal remedy mechanism of environmental infringement at a more macro level through judicial and administrative paths.

关 键 词：碳捕集与封存 环境侵权 司法救济 行政救济 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]