书写中国图书馆学史书的理论障碍与自洽路径  

Theoretical Obstacles and Breakthrough Direction of Writing Chinese Library Science History

作　　者：关思雨 Guan Siyu

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息管理学院

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2022年第5期49-58,共10页Library Development

摘　　要：学界对图书馆学史基本问题的认识具有历史性,目前对“古代校雠学”与“中国图书馆学”之间的关系问题停留在经验性的认可,因此,有必要在逻辑上探讨二者之间的关系以及未来书写“中国图书馆学史”可能的突破方向。从本体论、认识论、价值论和方法论四方面打破“古代校雠学”与“中国图书馆学”之间的学科壁垒,发现“古代校雠学”与“中国图书馆学”之间具有互包性的交叉关系、客观存在实践上的连续性,“古代校雠学”的部分观念具有广泛的价值共性。在“古代校雠学”具有图书馆学合法性的基础上,论证“知识论”是书写“中国图书馆学史”的突破方向,其是古今图书馆学的同源本体、一致认识、共同价值和系统方法。Academic researchers’ understanding to basic problems of library science history is of historical significance. At present, the relationship between “ancient emendation” and “Chinese library science” is still recognized by experience. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the relationship between the two logically and the possible breakthrough direction of writing Chinese library science history in the future.This paper breaks the disciplinary barrier between “ancient emendation” and “Chinese library science” from ontology, epistemology, axiology and methodology. It demonstrates the cross relationship between “ancient emendation” and “Chinese library science” and practical continuity of objective existence. The concept of “ancient textual criticism” has a wide range of common values. On the basis of the validity of “ancient emendation” in library science, the breakthrough direction of Chinese library science history is put forward. And it is proved that knowledge theory is the essence ontology, consistent recognition, common value and systematic method of ancient and modern library science.

关 键 词：校雠学 文献学 图书馆学史 图书馆学基础理论 

分 类 号：G250.9[文化科学—图书馆学]