重庆旅游业与城镇化耦合协调发展时空格局研究  

Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Coupling and Coordinated Development of Tourism and Urbanization in Chongqing

作　　者：冉婷 苏维词[1,2] 张进 RAN Ting;SU Wei-ci;ZHANG Jin(School of Geography and Tourism,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China;Research Institute of Mountain Resources and Environment in Guizhou Province,Guiyang Guizhou 550002,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆401331 [2]贵州省山地资源研究所,贵阳550002

出　　处：《西华师范大学学报（自然科学版）》2022年第4期436-443,共8页Journal of China West Normal University(Natural Sciences)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(42161052);教育部人文社科规划项目(20YJAZH093)。

摘　　要：城镇化与旅游业的良性互动是实现区域社会经济高质量发展的重要途径。在测度重庆市各区县旅游业与城镇化发展水平的基础上,运用熵权TOPSIS法、耦合协调度指数、探索性空间数据分析等方法,对2007—2017年重庆市县域旅游业与城镇化耦合协调发展水平及时空格局进行了分析。结果表明:(1)2007—2017年,重庆市旅游业与城镇化发展水平均整体提升,旅游业整体水平低于城镇化,但其发展速度快于城镇化;(2)旅游业发展水平高值区由热点旅游区(主城都市旅游、渝东北三峡旅游)向民族旅游、乡村旅游和生态旅游区(渝东南及主城周边区县)扩展,城镇化高值区主要分布在主城区,但县域城镇化发展速率和高值区空间分异明显;(3)县域旅游业与城镇化发展耦合协调度介于0.25~0.33,处于轻度失调状况,但失调状况逐步得到改善;(4)旅游业与城镇化协调类型出现极度失调、轻度失调、基本协调、良好协调4类,以轻度失调为主,轻度失调区占比由2007年的44.74%上升至2017年的84.21%,呈主城较高,其余区县较低的空间分布格局;(5)从耦合聚集性来看,旅游业与城镇化协调度具有显著的空间集聚特征,全局空间自相关指数波动上升后于2016年下降,高值集聚区分布于主城,低值集聚区主要分布在渝东北和渝东南地区,耦合协调度值两极分化明显、具有典型的“核心-边缘”结构。The positive interaction between urbanization and tourism is an important way to achieve high-quality regional development.Based on measuring the development level of tourism and urbanization in various districts and counties of Chongqing,the coupling and coordinated development level of county tourism and urbanization and its spatial-Temporal pattern from 2007 to 2017 is analyzed by the method of entropy weight TOPSIS,coupling coordination index,and exploratory spatial data analysis.The results show as follows:(1) From 2007 to 2017,the overall development level of tourism and urbanization in Chongqing had improved,and the overall level of tourism was lower than that of urbanization,but the development of tourism was faster than that of urbanization;(2) The high-value tourism development areas had expanded from hot tourism districts,i.e.the urban areas tourism and Three Gorges Tourism in Northeast Chongqing to ethnic tourism,rural tourism,and the ecotourism area(southeast Chongqing,the surrounding districts and counties in the main city zone);although the high-value urbanization areas were mainly distributed in urban areas,the differentiation between the development rate of county urbanization and the space of high-value areas was obvious;(3) The average degree of coupling and coordination between county tourism and urbanization development was between 0.25 and 0.33,which was in a mild state of imbalance,but the state of imbalance had gradually improved;(4) There were four types of coordination between tourism and urbanization,including extreme imbalances,mild imbalances,basic coordination and good coordination;the main types were mild imbalances,the proportion of which had increased from 44.74% in 2007 to 84.21% in 2017,showing a spatial distribution of higher urban areas and lower district and county areas;(5) From the perspective of coupling aggregation,the coordination degree between tourism and urbanization had presented significant spatial agglomeration characteristics;the overall autocorrelation index had

关 键 词：旅游业 城镇化 熵权TOPSIS 耦合协调度 空间自相关 重庆 

分 类 号：F127[经济管理—世界经济]