《五百家注音辩昌黎先生文集》所见韩文石本与集本的依违分合  

The Conflicts between Inscriptions and Printed Books Based on“Notes of Five Hundred Schools on the Collection of Han Changli”

作　　者：顾思程 GU Sicheng(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Peking University,Beijing 1000871,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学中国语言文学系,北京100871

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第5期94-98,共5页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：作为金石学的开山之作,欧阳修《集古录》取石刻文献校勘的思路对宋人整理韩集不乏垂范意义,但拓本天然存在的缺陷使后世学者面对石本与集本的依违颇感困惑。韩集校勘者转而将目光投向对韩文遣词义法之推敲。宋人对韩愈好作倒语的会心、对中唐文学尚奇传统的体认,促使他们选择更为符合自身期许的文字表达。南宋韩集注本《五百家注音辩昌黎先生文集》网罗大量宋人读韩的集体经验,呈现了宋代金石之学的勃兴、宋人对诗艺技法的钻研形诸韩集校理的痕迹。Ouyang Xiu’s“Collection of Ancient Recordings”was the pioneering work of epigraphy,whose idea of collating stone inscriptions set a good example for people in Song Dynasty to sort out the Collection of Han Yu.While due to the existence of the natural defects of rubbings,the later scholars felt confused about the inconformity between rubbings carved in stone and recorded in collection.Collators for Collection of Han Yu started to focus on the deliberation of the word selection and semantics of Han.The understanding of people of Song Dynasty for Han Yu’s inversions and their recognition of the odd literary expression in the middle of Tang Dynasty promoted them to choose the character expression that more complied with their own expectations.In Southern Song Dynasty,the Annotation of the Collection of Han“Notes of Five Hundred Schools on the Collection of Han Changli”collected a large number of Song people’s collective experience of reading Han Yu’s works.Based on this,the flourishing of the Song Dynasty’s study of gold and stone was presented.The Song people’s study of the art techniques of poetry showed the traces of the collation of the Collection of Han Yu.

关 键 词：韩愈 石刻 校勘 《五百家注音辩昌黎先生文集》 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]